Development and testing of the QDis-MH checklist for discharge letters from specialised mental healthcare: a stakeholder-centred study.

BACKGROUND: The 'discharge letter' is the mandatory written report sent from specialists in the specialist services to general practitioners (GPs) on patient discharge. Clear recommendations from relevant stakeholders for contents of discharge letters and instruments to measure the quality of discharge letters in mental healthcare are needed. The objectives were to (1) detect which information relevant stakeholders defined as important to include in discharge letters from mental health specialist services, (2) develop a checklist to measure the quality of discharge letters and (3) test the psychometric properties of the checklist. METHODS: We used a stepwise multimethod stakeholder-centred approach. Group interviews with GPs, mental health specialists and patient representatives defined 68 information items with 10 consensus-based thematic headings relevant to include in high-quality discharge letters. Information items rated as highly important by GPs (n=50) were included in the Quality of Discharge information-Mental Health (QDis-MH) checklist. The 26-item checklist was tested by GPs (n=18) and experts in healthcare improvement or health services research (n=15). Psychometric properties were assessed using estimates of intrascale consistency and linear mixed effects models. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability were assessed using Gwet's agreement coefficient (Gwet's AC1) and intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The QDis-MH checklist had satisfactory intrascale consistency. Inter-rater reliability was poor to moderate, and test-retest reliability was moderate. In descriptive analyses, mean checklist scores were higher in the category of discharge letters defined as 'good' than in 'medium' or 'poor' letters, but differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: GPs, mental health specialists and patient representatives defined 26 information items relevant to include in discharge letters in mental healthcare. The QDis-MH checklist is valid and feasible. However, when using the checklist, raters should be trained and the number of raters kept to a minimum due to questionable inter-rater reliability.

Benchmarking of abdominal surgery: a study evaluating the HARM score in a European national cohort.

BACKGROUND: Reliable, easily accessible metrics of surgical quality are currently lacking. The HARM (HospitAl length of stay, Readmission and Mortality) score is a composite measure that has been validated across diverse surgical cohorts. The aim of this study was to validate the HARM score in a national population of patients undergoing abdominal surgery. METHODS: Data on all abdominal surgery in Norwegian hospitals from 2011 to 2017 were obtained from the Norwegian Patient Registry. Readmissions and 30-day postoperative complications as well as deaths in and out of hospital were evaluated. The HARM scoring algorithm was tested after adjustment by establishing a newly proposed length of stay score. The correlation between the HARM score and complications, as well as the ability of aggregated HARM scores to discriminate between hospitals, were analysed. Risk adjustment models were developed for nationwide hospital comparisons. RESULTS: The data consisted of 407 113 primary operations on 295 999 patients in 85 hospitals. The HARM score was associated with complications and complication severity (Goodman-Kruskal γ value 0·59). Surgical specialty was the dominating variable for risk adjustment. Based on 1-year data, the risk-adjusted score classified 16 hospitals as low HARM score and 16 as high HARM score of the 53 hospitals that had at least 30 operations. CONCLUSION: The HARM score correlates with major outcomes and is associated with the presence and severity of complications. After risk adjustment, the HARM score discriminated strongly between hospitals in a European population of abdominal surgery.

ANTECEDENTES: En la actualidad no se dispone de un sistema de cuantificación numérica confiable y accesible para evaluar la calidad quirúrgica. La puntuación HARM es una medida compuesta basada en la duración de la estancia hospitalaria, los reingresos y la mortalidad postoperatoria que se ha validado en varias cohortes quirúrgicas. El objetivo de este estudio fue validar la puntuación HARM en una población nacional de pacientes sometidos a cirugía abdominal. MÉTODOS: Se obtuvieron los datos de todas las cirugías abdominales realizadas en hospitales noruegos entre 2011 y 2017 a través del registro noruego de pacientes. Se evaluaron los reingresos y las complicaciones postoperatorias a los 30 días, así como la mortalidad intra- y extra-hospitalaria. Se utilizó el algoritmo de puntuación HARM tras el ajuste con la nueva propuesta de puntuación para la duración de la estancia hospitalaria. Se analizó la correlación entre HARM y complicaciones, así como la capacidad de las puntuaciones HARM agregadas para discriminar entre hospitales. Se desarrollaron modelos de ajuste de riesgo para las comparar hospitales en todo el país. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 407.113 intervenciones primarias llevadas a cabo en 295.999 pacientes en 85 hospitales. La puntuación HARM se asoció con las complicaciones y la gravedad de la complicación (Goodman-Kruskal γ de 0,59). La especialidad quirúrgica fue la variable dominante para el ajuste del riesgo. Utilizando los datos de un período anual, la puntuación ajustada al riesgo clasificó a 16 hospitales como de baja puntuación y a 16 de alta puntuación de los 53 hospitales en los que se habían realizado al menos 30 intervenciones. CONCLUSIÓN: La puntuación HARM se correlaciona con los resultados principales y con la presencia y la gravedad de las complicaciones. La puntuación HARM, después del ajuste de riesgo, discrimina de forma sólida entre hospitales en una población europea de cirugía abdominal. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Complications, reoperations, readmissions, and length of hospital stay in 34 639 surgical cases of lumbar disc herniation.

AIMS: The aims of this study were to determine the rates of surgical complications, reoperations, and readmissions following herniated lumbar disc surgery, and to investigate the impact of sociodemographic factors and comorbidity on the rate of such unfavourable events. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a longitudinal observation study. Data from herniated lumbar disc operations were retrieved from a large medical database using a combination of procedure and diagnosis codes from all public hospitals in Norway from 1999 to 2013. The impact of age, gender, geographical affiliation, education, civil status, income, and comorbidity on unfavourable events were analyzed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 34 639 operations, 2.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6 to 2.9) had a surgical complication, 2.1% (95% CI 2.0 to 2.3) had repeat surgery within 90 days, 2.4% (95% CI 2.2 to 2.5) had a non-surgical readmission within 90 days, and 6.7% (95% CI 6.4 to 6.9) experienced at least one of these unfavourable events. Unfavourable events were found to be associated with advanced age and comorbidity. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that surgical complications are less frequent than previously suggested. There are limited associations between sociodemographic patient characteristics and unfavourable events. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:470-477.

Ethnicity differences in breast cancer stage at the time of diagnosis in Norway.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Several studies have demonstrated that breast cancer survival rates differ with ethnicity. Most of these studies analyzed discrepancies between African-American and Caucasian-American women and were performed in the United States. There are increasing concerns about differences in breast cancer survival among immigrants from Asia and Africa living in Europe, including those living in Scandinavian countries. There are few data on breast cancer survival in relation to race or ethnicity in Scandinavian countries, even though immigrants from Asia and Africa have lived in Scandinavian countries for decades. The aim of this study was to identify variations in breast cancer incidence, treatment modalities, relapse, and survival among women from Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and Somalia compared to ethnic Norwegian women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The incidence, treatment modalities, relapse, and survival of breast cancer were analyzed in women from Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and Somalia in a nation-based study over a period of 7 ears. Results for women from Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and Somalia were compared with those from a group of ethnic Norwegian women during the same period. In our study, 63 patients from Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and Somalia were diagnosed with breast cancer during the period 2002-2009 in Norway. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Comparison between women from Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and Somalia and ethnic women from Norway revealed significant differences in cancer stage at the time of diagnosis, age at diagnosis, type of surgical treatment, and relapse and breast cancer mortality rates. The findings of this study demonstrate that the outcome after a breast cancer diagnosis is significantly worse for women from Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and Somalia than for ethnic Norwegian women. In addition, the mean age at the breast cancer diagnosis was lower for women from Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and Somalia, especially those from Sri Lanka and Somalia, than for ethnic Norwegian women.

Importance of the CD3 marker for evaluating changes in rhesus macaque CD4/CD8 T-cell ratios.

BACKGROUND: Until recently, there were no CD3 antibodies that crossreacted with rhesus macaque T cells. Consequently, studies relying on CD8 counts or CD4/CD8 ratios enumerated this subpopulation on the basis of CD8+ or CD8bright+ staining. We used a rhesus-specific, anti-CD3 antibody to better define the CD8+ T-cell population, and to show the effects of better measurements on CD4/CD8 ratios and changes in T cells as macaques age. METHODS: We used three-color flow cytometry to measure CD4 and CD8 populations with and without CD3 costaining. Venous blood samples were obtained from 52 colony-bred macaques between 2 months and 9 years of age. RESULTS: The CD8+ T cells defined by CD3 and CD8 double staining were approximately 60% of all cells that were stained by CD8 alone. Improved detection of this lymphocyte subset showed that CD4/CD8 ratios were close to the range of 1.5-2.0. Declining CD4/CD8 ratios during aging are predominantly due to decreasing CD4+ T-cell counts. CONCLUSIONS: Better quantitation of the CD8+ T-cell population showed that the CD4/CD8 ratio was not inverted as had been reported, but is actually very similar to the values observed in human beings. Although the two species differ in the pattern of CD8 expression, the general immune system characteristics are very similar.

[Achilles tendon rupture. Surgical or non-surgical treatment]. / Akillesseneruptur. Operativ eller ikke-operativ behandling.

Opinions differ about the proper treatment of Achilles tendon rupture. 38 patients with acute total rupture of the Achilles tendon were included in a comparative study of operative as against non-operative treatment. 21 of the patients were treated operatively and 17 non-operatively. The follow-up time was 6-53 months. Three of the non-operated patients but none of the operated group experienced major complications. Ten of the non-operated patients and 14 of the non-operated group experienced minor complications. In the non-operated patients the plantar-flexion range was significantly reduced in the injured foot compared with the other foot (p = 0.03). Because of more re-ruptures and reduced muscle strength in the non-operative group, operative treatment is recommended for active persons. Non-operative treatment may be considered for older people.